GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Luxembourg bans BASF's GM potato

Details
Published: 18 June 2010
Twitter
APPEAL: Please support GMWatch
http://gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/12290-please-support-gmwatch

EXTRACT: The political message is courageous and final: Luxembourg asserts loudly and clearly that it is not ready to accept a GMO menu dictated to it by the European Commission. Following Austria, it's the second European Member State that has taken the decision to protect consumers and agriculture from the negative consequences of "Amflora".
–-
–-
LUXEMBOURG BANS THE "AMFLORA" GM POTATO!
Greenpeace France, 16 June 2010
http://ogm.greenpeace.fr/le-luxembourg-interdit-la-pomme-de-terre-ogm-amflora

[Translation courtesy GM-free Ireland]

During the this morning's "Safety on my plate" conference on the safety of the food chain, Luxembourg's Health Minister Mars Di Bartolomeo banned the cultivation of BASF's "Amflora" GM potato in Luxembourg, in the presence of the Agriculture Minister Romain Schneider.

Luxembourg free of all GM cultivation

Luxembourg's ban on the cultivation of the GM potato was announced barely a few months after its approval by the European Commission, before the high representatives of the authority in charge of food safety in Europe (EFSA).

This was at the same location (the Neumunster Abbey Cultural Centre) where Luxembourg banned MON810 transgenic maize in 2009.

The political message is courageous and final: Luxembourg asserts loudly and clearly that it is not ready to accept a GMO menu dictated to it by the European Commission. Following Austria, it's the second European Member State that has taken the decision to protect consumers and agriculture from the negative consequences of "Amflora".

Greenpeace and the "GM-free Luxembourg" partner organisations congratulate the Health Minister for taking responsibility on behalf of the consumer, and encourage the Government to continue its determined opposition to the European Commission’s pro-GMO policy.

A risk assessment that must be thoroughly reformed in Europe.

On 2 March 2010, the European Commmission approved the "Amflora" GMO potato developed by the German chemicals giant BASF for cultivation, use in animal feed and presence up to 0.9% in human food. This decision was made despite scientific evidence about the risk of anti-biotic resistance.

Greenpeace and the organisations of the "GM-free Luxembourg" initiative point out that the European Union's GMO risk assessment and approvals process is deficient and must be reformed.

The current process fails to consider the long-term effecs of GMOs on health and the environment, together with their socio-economic costs for the whole agricultural production chain. "We request the Government of Luxembourg to continue its commmitent for reform of the GMO risk assessment and approvals procedure, in order to directly protect consumers, the environment and agriculture from the negative effects of GMOs", said Maurice Losch of Greenpeace Luxembourg.

(1): The 20 organisations of the "GM-free Luxembourg" [Luxembourg sans OGM] Initiative:
Aide í  l’Enfance de l’Inde, Association Solidarité Luxembourg Nicaragua, ASTM, Attac Luxembourg, Bauerenallianz, bioLABEL Lëtzebuerg, BIONA, Caritas Luxembourg, Demeter Bond Lëtzebuerg, í‰glise Catholique í  Luxembourg, í‹mweltberodung Lëtzebuerg asbl. (EBL), FCPT SYPROLUX, FNCTTFEL Landesverband, Fondation Hëllef fir d’Natur, Frí¨res des Hommes, GREENPEACE Luxembourg, Haus vun der Natur, Initiativ Liewensufank, LCGB, Lëtzebuerger Natur- a Vulleschutzliga, Lëtzebuerger Landesverband fir Beienzuucht, Life asbl., Mouvement í‰cologique, OGBL, Slow Food Lëtzebuerg, SOS Faim Luxembourg, Stroossekanner Sao Paulo a.s.b.l., TransFair Minka a.s.b.l., Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs (ULC)

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design