GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Latest News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • Archive
      • 2018 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
    • Daily Digest
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
  • Contact
  • About
  • Links
  • Donations

LATEST NEWS

  • Exposé of Monsanto's history of toxic pollution nominated for award
  • CFS and State of California win appeal over listing of glyphosate as probable carcinogen
  • UCSF Industry Documents Library publishes key agrichemical industry papers
  • Local courts lift Arkansas dicamba ban, creating chaos
  • Zombie GMO myths
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMO INFO

10 Questions About GM Foods
Do GMOs increase yields and reduce pesticide use, and are they needed to feed the world? Find out in the 16-page document, 10 Questions About GM Foods.

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Michael Gove's embrace of gene editing prompts "Frankencow" backlash

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 10 January 2018
Created: 10 January 2018
Last Updated: 10 January 2018
Twitter

NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle urged caution over livestock gene editing over concerns it was not acceptable to consumers

GMWatch is quoted in the article below, which, astonishingly, has a man from the normally pro-GMO National Farmers Union (NFU) cautioning UK enviro secretary Michael Gove over his enthusiasm for genome editing of livestock animals. The source article from which the quote is taken is here:
http://gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2018/18056
---

Michael Gove's embrace of gene editing prompts 'Frankencow' backlash

Alex Black
Farmers Guardian, 10 Jan 2018
https://www.fginsight.com/news/news/michael-goves-embrace-of-gene-editing-prompts-frankencow-backlash-49188

* NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle urged caution over livestock gene editing over concerns it was not acceptable to consumers.

The NFU has expressed concern about Defra Secretary Michael Gove’s embrace of gene editing technology, which he claimed could help livestock farmers remove vulnerabilities to illness and develop more valuable animals.

In his speech at Oxford Farming Conference, Mr Gove welcomed the technological advances in this area, suggesting they offered the possibility of ‘conquering’ human and animal diseases.

But NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle was nervous of consumer reaction to genetically edited meat.

Mr Gove’s speech has already prompted criticism from campaigners, with the Daily Mail reporting it could lead to ‘Frankencows’.

Mr Royle said: “I am not so sure it is commercially viable. I think we have got to be mindful about consumer perceptions. People want higher welfare, good health and animals which have lived a good life.

“It has got this connotation animals live in a less natural way.”

He added the industry needed to demonstrate its environmental, high welfare and health credentials to the public.

The backlash to Mr Gove’s speech continued with campaign group GM Watch accusing him of ‘disingenuously’ mixing medical applications of genome editing for curing diseases with editing of animals.

In a statement, the group claimed medical uses were largely non-contentious and could progress entirely independently of food crop and animal research.

The statement continued: “But genome editing of animals and food crops is wildly unpopular and entails the risk of producing off-target effects which pass undetected to consumers.”

Instead of focusing on gene editing, Mr Royle suggested farmers exploit more conventional techniques, alongside practices such as genomic mapping, to breed the best animals for meat and dairy.

He said: “We can still use this effectively to make sure we use the right bulls on the right cows.”

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2018 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design