GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2004 articles

'Conflict of interest' exposed in GMO advisory panel

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 26 July 2004
Created: 26 July 2004
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

FOCUS ON AFRICA
http://www.gmwatch.org/p1temp.asp?pid=37&page=1

'International GM pressure group GM Watch, together with other groups such as Biowatch and the African Centre for Biosafety, view the GMO Act as deeply flawed. "Shoddy research was done in the drafting, while the experts involved were not independent," said Mariam Mayet, the director of the African Centre for Biosafety.'
-------

'Conflict of interest' in GMO advisory panel
Mail & Guardian, 23 July 2004
Yolandi Groenewald
http://www.mg.co.za/Content/l3.asp?ao=119188

Pressure groups opposed to genetically modified (GM) organisms say some of the experts advising the government on permits for GM products are guilty of conflicting interests.

Particular concern is focused on a state official, Muffy Koch, who advises the government on whether to grant permits to companies to test genetically modified organisms (GMOs), while consulting for the companies during the subsequent trials.

Koch serves on a sub-committee of the advisory committee in the Department of Agriculture that evaluates applications for permits to release GM food crops into the environment for the purposes of field trials. Her committee prepares a recommendation to be reviewed by an executive council, comprising representatives from various government departments.

Koch's company, Golden Genomics, is consulting on biosafety standards in field trials of potatoes that are genetically modified to resist attack by tuber moth.

She is also a member of the pro-GM "stakeholder group", AfricaBio, and helped draft South Africa's GMO Act.

International GM pressure group GM Watch, together with other groups such as Biowatch and the African Centre for Biosafety, view the GMO Act as deeply flawed. "Shoddy research was done in the drafting, while the experts involved were not independent," said Mariam Mayet, the director of the African Centre for Biosafety.

Jonathan Matthews, co-founder of GM Watch, said many South African advisers were too close to the GM industry to rule objectively on trials. Other interest groups such as Biowatch have raised the same concerns.

"Koch's career raises important questions about where the lines are drawn between regulation, lobbying and private companies," Matthews said.

He complained that owing to its lax biosafety controls South Africa's intake of GM crops was more rapid than that of any country besides the United States.

"The fact that our biosafety controls readily allow GM imports and GM crop releases into the environment is no accident," he said. "It is the result of its having been shaped from an early stage by influential proponents of GM like Koch."

This week Koch said that her role as a consultant to GM trials and adviser to the government in permit decisions did not involve conflicting interests.

"I do consult on GM trials, but there are only so many expert scientists on GM available in South Africa. That is why I am on the government's advisory list as well," she said. "But I would never advise on a GM product that I was consulted on, or vice versa."

She also said AfricaBio did not dictate her views.

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design