GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Gene Editing
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Search
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • Gene Editing
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

Re: National Biotech Policy On The Anvil - Sole NGO Representative Quits Panel

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 03 February 2005
Twitter

Here's a correction relating to an article from India's Financial Express, which we carried a couple of days ago, which said the sole NGO representative - Suman Sahai of Gene Campaign - on the committee hammering out India's national biotech policy had quit. According to the Financial Express there are eight representatives from industry on the committee.
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4853
-------

CLARIFICATION FROM SUMAN SAHAI

There has been an incorrect report in the media that I have resigned from the Expert Committee set up to frame the National Biotechnology Policy in India. I have not resigned. Instead, I have been engaged in a long and frustrating dialogue with the Expert Committee since October 2004 to change the process of framing the national policy.

Specifically, I have been asking the Committee to
* Include a far greater representation of stakeholders on the Expert Committee
* Open the discussion to the public so that the decision making follows a democratic process.
*Conduct all deliberations in an open and transparent manner
* Ask for a Joint Parliamentary Committee to hear the views from various stakeholder groups, diverse experts and concerned citizens
*Prolong the thoroughly inadequate period of three months designated to frame the policy so that a proper debate is enabled with decent participation

The latest (as of two days ago) in this ongoing harangue is a renewed request to invite comments on whatever draft document has been prepared so far, and use this as the basis document for a larger public debate as well as to take action on all the aspects/ points listed above.

Let us see how the Committee responds to these suggestions, then Gene Campaign and partners and friends will decide on a future course of action.

Suman Sahai

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design