GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

The American Chestnut Foundation pulls support for failed GM American Chestnut tree

Details
Published: 10 December 2023
Twitter

TACF cites "significant performance limitations"

In a December 8 press release, the American Chestnut Foundation (TACF) announced that it was withdrawing support for the "Darling 58" genetically engineered American chestnut tree "for several pending regulatory petitions that would authorise distribution of transgenic Darling trees outside permitted research plots".

TACF cited "significant performance limitations that, from TACF’s perspective, make it unsuitable as a restoration tree".

TACF said: "Throughout 2023, TACF and its partners observed disappointing performance results from broad scale field and greenhouse tests of advanced-generation Darling trees across several different geographic locations at external testing facilities. As discussed in the September 15, 2023 episode of the Foundation’s webinar series, Chestnut Chat, analysis indicated striking variability in Darling trees’ blight tolerance, significant losses in growth competitiveness, and increased mortality."

William Pitt, TACF’s President and CEO, said, “Within the past few weeks, academic colleagues brought to our attention their newest findings suggesting a significant identity error in the propagation materials supplied to TACF. Independent confirmation now shows all pollen and trees used for this research was derived not from Darling 58, but from a different prototype, one which contains a deletion in a known gene. That deletion, along with the discouraging field performance collectively renders these trees, in TACF’s opinion, unsuitable as the basis for species restoration. Fortunately, we have newer and better-performing trees ready to test.”

Sara Fern Fitzsimmons, TACF’s Chief Conservation Officer said, "It is our assessment that these trees would impair future deployment of disease-resistant American chestnut populations. Premature distribution of this or other inferior varieties also may unfairly skew public perception against biotechnology solutions to save threatened forest tree species.”

This announcement follows closely on the heels of calls by a coalition of organisations for the US Department of Agriculture to reject deregulation of the Darling 58 GM chestnut tree based on the revelation by researchers of significant problems with the tree.

In a statement on December 7, Global Justice Ecology Project Executive Director Anne Petermann said, "The only ethical move by the D58 researchers, knowing these GE [GM] trees have problems that they don’t understand, is to withdraw their petition to the USDA for deregulation of the D58. Now that the TACF has withdrawn support for this failed project, we again call on the USDA to deny the petition for deregulation."

 

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design