GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

LATEST VIDEOS

  • Herbicide-tolerant/Bt cotton chaos in Indian fields
  • Seed keepers and truth tellers: From the frontlines of GM agriculture
  • Myths and Truths of Gene-Edited Foods

KEVIN FOLTA: A rogue’s gallery

Roundup, dollars and Kevin Folta

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

EU Commission backs removing safety checks for new GMOs

Details
Published: 29 April 2021
Twitter

Researcher with GMO plants

New report fails to follow European Court of Justice ruling, in a win for the biotech industry that spells bad news for farming, the environment and the public

The European Commission has opened the door to exempting a new generation of genetically modified crops from safety checks before being allowed onto the EU market, according to a key study released today.

The study finds that there are “strong indications that the current 2001 GMO legislation is not fit for purpose for some NGTs [new genomic techniques, or new GM techniques] and their products”, and proposes a new consultation process that could break with decades of safety checks to protect the environment and public health.

If this line of argument is taken up by the EU institutions and passed into law, it would mean that new GMOs – such as gene editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas – would not be labelled as GMOs on shelves if they end up on the market, nor be subject to traceability requirements in case product recalls are needed.

By contrast, the German environment minister and the Austrian government have both stated their position that the new generation of GMOs should continue to be regulated by existing EU GMO law. Some 161 farmers’ groups and civil society organisations have also written to the European Commission to support the point.

Mute Schimpf, food and farming campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe said: “The European Commission has fallen hook, line and sinker for the biotech industry’s spin, and has set the future of food and farming in the EU down a dark path today. They are suggesting tearing up decades of the precautionary principle, by allowing new GM crops onto our fields and plates without safety tests.

"It’s now up to national farming and environment ministers to make sure the EU stops wasting time trying to find loopholes to allow these new crops onto our fields and plates, and get on with the urgent business of making our farming system more sustainable by getting rid of industrial farming and promoting agroecology.”

The study, requested in 2019 by the European Council, diverges significantly from a 2018 European Court of Justice ruling which underlined similarities in the potential risks between a new generation of GMOs and their predecessors.

Not a fix for sustainable farming – empty promises

EU Health and Food Safety Commissioner Stella Kyriakides highlighted that the study “concludes that New Genomic Techniques can promote the sustainability of agricultural production, in line with the objectives of our Farm to Fork Strategy”.

However, the only new GMO submitted for authorisation in the EU so far is a strain of maize which is resistant to the pesticide glufosinate – indicating that for all of the rhetoric and spin, the new generation of GMOs continue to function as a mechanism for facilitating the unsustainable model of pesticide-dependent farming that the Farm to Fork Strategy is intended to tackle.

The study also comes following a sustained campaign from the biotech industry to exempt new GMOs from safety regulations.

The European Commission will now send the study for discussion at upcoming Agriculture and Environment Councils, where ministers will decide whether to accept or reject the policy recommendations, or propose their own. An impact assessment and public consultation to explore different regulatory options will then follow.


Source of comment: Friends of the Earth Europe
https://friendsoftheearth.eu/press-release/eu-commission-backs-removing-safety-checks-for-new-gmos/

 

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design