GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2023 articles
  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Parliament expected to make breakthrough on countries’ right to ban GM crop cultivation

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 06 November 2014
Twitter

Greenpeace expects members of the European Parliament to substantially improve law

EXCERPT: Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director Marco Contiero said, “The new Parliament has a unique chance to demonstrate that it listens to the will of EU citizens. We urge Parliamentarians to radically strengthen the draft law so that it delivers on what it promises: a legally solid right to ban GM crops. Such national bans should be able to withstand legal attacks by the biotech industry.”

Parliament expected to make breakthrough on countries’ right to ban GM crop cultivation

Greenpeace media briefing
5 November 2014
http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/en/Publications/2014/Parliament-expected-to-make-breakthrough-on-countries-right-to-ban-GM-crop-cultivation/

On Tuesday 11 November, the European Parliament will vote on a new law on national bans of genetically modified (GM) crops. The Parliament’s environment committee will amend the position agreed last June by environment ministers [1], which, according to Greenpeace, was riddled with legal holes and went against the Parliament’s earlier vote.[2]

Greenpeace expects members of the European Parliament to substantially improve this law. Specifically, the Parliament is expected to reinstate the countries’ right to use environmental concerns as one of the reasons for banning GM crop cultivation, and to limit the central role that the EU ministers wanted to offer to biotech companies in the banning process.

Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director Marco Contiero said, “The new Parliament has a unique chance to demonstrate that it listens to the will of EU citizens. We urge Parliamentarians to radically strengthen the draft law so that it delivers on what it promises: a legally solid right to ban GM crops. Such national bans should be able to withstand legal attacks by the biotech industry.”

Background information on the European Parliament and Council positions

The text adopted by the Council in June 2014 largely ignores the vote by the European Parliament in 2011. The Council text creates a system which restricts countries’ right to ban GM cultivation in their territory, in particular by:

1. preventing member states from using environmental concerns related to their national territory as a reason to ban GM cultivation

2. obliging member states willing to ban GM to first attempt to strike a deal with biotech companies, trying to convince them to exclude the territory of that member state from the scope of the GM crop’s authorisation request

3. setting a two-year deadline (from the date of the authorisation granted to a GM crop) after which a member state would not be allowed to ban the cultivation of a GM crop anymore

4. allowing member states to only ban one GM crop at a time, instead of all GMOs or groups of GMOs defined by crop or trait, as foreseen by both the Commission and the Parliament

Greenpeace expects the Parliament to divert from the Council text by:

1. letting member states justify national bans because of environmental concerns

2. changing the legal basis of the proposed legislation from the article that relates to the internal market (Art. 114 TFEU) to the article on the environment (Art. 192 TFEU)

3. reconfirming the European Commission approach to give countries the right to ban all GMOs or groups of GMOs defined by crop or trait

4. removing the formal role given by the Council to biotech companies in the banning process

5. requiring member states to protect organic and conventional farmers from GM contamination through "co-existence" measures, and to introduce a liability regime for cases of GM contamination

Notes:
[1] Greenpeace comment on Environment Ministers’ agreed position, 12 June 2014.
[2] European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 July 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMs in their territory (COM(2010)0375 – C7-0178/2010 – 2010/0208(COD)).

Contacts:
Marco Contiero, Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director: +32 (0)477 77 70 34 (mobile), This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Greenpeace EU pressdesk: +32 (0)2 274 1911, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design