GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2023 articles
  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Bollworms develop resistance against Bt cotton in Pakistan

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 16 July 2014
Twitter

In Pakistan, experts believe that low level of Bt toxins in GM cotton crops have immunised the pests instead of killing them

Bollworms develop resistance against Bt cotton crop

Jamal Shahid
Dawn.com, 14 Jul 2014
http://www.dawn.com/news/1119078/bollworms-develop-resistance-against-bt-cotton-crop

Farmers and agriculture scientists are alarmed by the destructive attack of bollworms this year that seem to have developed resistance against the genetically-modified (GM) cotton crop.

The surprise comes especially when different species of bollworms, such as American, Pink and Spotted bollworm, were supposed to be eradicated after feasting on the GM Bt cotton crop. Instead, these destructive pests have attacked a major cotton growing belt in Southern Punjab, this year.

Farmers fear instead of being eliminated, the bollworms developed resistance due to insufficient toxin levels in Bt cotton crop.

If not controlled, the pests’ attack on cotton crop will most likely damage the quality of fibre and the cotton seed, resulting in a decline in the yield this year.

“All Bt varieties of cotton have failed to kill bollworms and live up to their agricultural success stories. We have found four separate patches in our fields where Army bollworm and mealy bug have attacked the crop,” said Chaudhry Gohar Ali, who grows cotton in Vehari near Multan.

The 73-year-old cotton grower complained that most farmers felt helpless and concerned government offices were urging the farmers to continuously spray pesticides.

Despite availability of Bt varieties Bollgard-II (BG-2) and Roundup Ready Flex (RRF) cotton in the markets of Southern Punjab and Sindh, it was surprising that the farmers were reporting pest development in the cotton fields.

A cotton grower from Shahdadpur in Sindh, Muhammad Bux, is equally concerned about his crop spread on 100 acres.

“I am surprised how these pests have survived after eating the Bt cotton crop. Pests should be dying because of the high doses of toxins in Bt cotton plant and not developing resistance, which seems to be the case here,” said Bux, who was also resorting to more than usual dose of pesticide. He explained that since the last few years, the Gulabi Sundi (Pink Bollworm) has been causing devastation in three districts of Sindh every year and farmers have to spray pesticides to save their GM cotton crop.

With prices of pesticides ranging between Rs600 to Rs700 per litre, the costs of production have also gone higher for the farmers, without any relief from government. The usage of pesticides increased after Bt was introduced in Pakistan, as the cotton production had been reducing.

According to experts in Pakistan Agriculture Research Council (PARC), pests have possibly started developing a resistance against Bt crops, since they were introduced in 2004-05. The genetically modified cotton seeds contain insufficient dose of toxins that killed pests and were also of poor quality.

“The government has spent an estimated Rs985 million, besides foreign aid, in this regard in the name of research and development of biotechnology. Instead of developing indigenous modified seeds, researchers and scientists ended up copying technology from multinational seed-producing companies and started selling them in the markets to local farmers,” said an agriculture expert in PARC.

When GM crops were officially introduced in Pakistan in 2010, the move was resisted as some stakeholders believed that bollworms were less disastrous than leaf curl virus and mealy bug, against which Bt is completely ineffective.

The senior official also added that there was no national pest management programme to educate farmers regarding pests and to monitor the development of resistance.

Documents by Punjab Pest Alert Department, available with Dawn, show how the threat of these bollworms had always been as low as one to two per cent in Punjab, where 80 to 90 per cent of the country’s cotton is produced amounting to about 10 million bales annually.

Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) Director Agriculture and Biotech Dr Nayyer Iqbal did not seem surprised by the attack of bollworms on cotton crop.

“Resistance in pests has been developing because of low toxin levels. Some Bt seed variety have absolutely no toxin doses at all, making the crop vulnerable to pest infestation,” said Dr Iqbal, explaining in not so many words how a host of problems associated with GM seed in Pakistan had caused the new technology to almost fail.

“The idea of introducing genetically modified seeds in Pakistan was to minimise pesticide usage and reduce the costs of inputs, apart from keeping the environment clean,” said Dr Iqbal, who explained how several uncertified and unregulated varieties of seeds were being sold in the market without any government departments regulating the quality of seeds.

“It is a little early to elaborate on how widespread the attack is. But it will definitely impact the cotton yield,” Dr Iqbal said. Sarwar Rahi, who is a technical manager for a private pesticides and seed importing company, recently completed a field survey in Multan and confirmed the attacks of bollworms in Punjab. “The farmers are using substandard seed that is also low in toxins available in the market. It is being presumed that pests are developing resistance due to low toxin levels in Bt seed varieties,” Mr Rahi said.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design