GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

GM crop plantings fall in industrialized nations

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 19 February 2014
Twitter

GM crop plantings fell in industrialized nations for the first time since the technology was commercialized in 1996, with Canada and Australia cutting back.

This, of course, is why the biotech industry is aggressively targeting the so-called developing nations with its proprietary GM seed.

---

Modified crop plantings fall in industrialised nations

Jack Kaskey

Businessweek, 17 Feb 2014

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-02-13/modified-crops-shrink-in-industrialized-nations-for-first-time

Genetically modified crop plantings fell in industrialized nations for the first time since the technology was commercialized in 1996, an industry report said.

Plantings in those countries fell about 2 percent to 81 million hectares (200 million acres) last year as Canada sowed less modified canola and Australia cut back on cotton, the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications said in a report today.

"Growth is plateauing as far as the major industrial countries are concerned," said Clive James, the report's author and founder of Ithaca, New York-based ISAAA. The group is funded by governments, foundations, and companies including Monsanto Co. (MON:US), the largest developer of biotech crops.

"The major trend is going to be in the developing countries, which for the second consecutive year planted more than industrial countries," he said in an interview.

The $15.6 billion modified-seed industry faces political opposition in the European Union while the U.S., its largest market, is almost saturated. In contrast, higher plantings in Brazil helped to lift the global total by 3 percent to a record 175.2 million hectares.

Crops developed using biotechnology contain genes from other species that bestow new traits, such as tolerating herbicides or producing bug-killing proteins.

Brazil has led global gains in the cultivation of biotech crops for half a decade. That's partly because of its fast-track regulatory approval system, James said.

Cotton Decline

Monsanto is counting on Latin America to drive sales growth this decade. Its Intacta beans, designed to control insects and introduced this year across 3 million acres in Brazil, have a potential market of 100 million acres, the St. Louis-based company has said.

In the U.S., the leading market for modified crops, plantings rose less than 1 percent to 70.1 million hectares last year amid a drop in modified cotton, according to James.

Modified plants accounted for 90 percent of U.S. corn while 93 percent of the soy crop was genetically engineered.

Modified cotton fell to 90 percent of the U.S. crop, from 94 percent a year earlier, according to USDA data compiled by Bloomberg. Drought prompted some farmers to switch to cheaper conventional seed on their least productive land, said Mark Kelley, a cotton agronomist at Texas A&M University's AgriLife Extension Service in Lubbock.

The decline in modified plantings in Canada was due to an 800,000-hectare reduction in canola as farmers rotated more conventional wheat into their fields, while lower overall cotton plantings in Australia reduced use of biotech varieties there, James said. Still, 96 percent of Canadian canola and more than 99 percent of Australian cotton were genetically modified, he said.

The number of nations using the technology held steady at 27 after Bangladesh farmers sowed insect-resistant eggplant for the first time, James said. Further growth may come from new engineered crops such as potatoes that resist late blight and herbicide-tolerant sugar cane, while China may could soon authorize the planting of engineered corn and eventually approve biotech rice, he said.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2022 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design