GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Fresh fight looms over Europe GM crops

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 26 June 2008
Twitter
NOTE: Interesting comments from GM-producer nations Brazil and Argentina, totally undermining the reason claimed for the change.

EXTRACT: Diplomatic sources in Brazil and Argentina, which supply almost all the EU's animal feed supplies and soya for processed food, also question the apocalyptic scenario.

"We produce to satisfy our clients. We are not going to produce something they are not going to buy," said a Brazilian source.
---
---
Fresh fight looms over Europe GM crops
By Andrew Bounds in Brussels
Financial Times, June 24 2008
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fe227c42-4209-11dd-a5e8-0000779fd2ac.html

Europe is poised for a fresh battle over genetically modified crops as its top regulator moves to relax a zero-tolerance policy on unauthorised GM imports.

Androulla Vassiliou, European Union health commissioner, is set to recommend lifting the threshold for GM "contamination" in response to pressure from farmers and the food industry, which claim they are spending millions of pounds finding alternatives.

Environmental campaigners, however, say warnings that the EU could be unable to find supplies are scaremongering. Diplomatic sources in Brazil and Argentina, which supply almost all the EU's animal feed supplies and soya for processed food, also question the apocalyptic scenario.

"We produce to satisfy our clients. We are not going to produce something they are not going to buy," said a Brazilian source.

Ms Vassiliou is likely to propose lifting the threshold from zero to 0.1 per cent. That would cover most of the recent contamination cases, such as the LL601 incident in 2006 when genetically modified rice came into the EU from the US and had to be withdrawn from the market, costing companies involved millions of euros.

The change would not require new legislation and the subsequent support of a qualified majority of EU ministers and the European parliament. Ms Vassilliou's spokeswoman said that experts from member states, however, would have to agree the policy change.

"We are looking at a technical solution that would not require changing the law," said Ms Vassiliou’s spokeswoman. It is the least radical option called for. The food industry had pushed for 0.9 per cent, in line with the amount of GM allowed in foodstuffs without having to be labelled. The US wants 5 per cent.

EU citizens and their governments are broadly hostile to GM. It can take up to four years to approve a new product even for animal feed imports, the most uncontroversial area. In the US, by contrast, the process takes a few months so there are many more approved crops.

With the EU dependent on imports for 77 per cent of its animal feed, farmers are left paying about 10 per cent more for supplies than rivals, and trade is occasionally disrupted when an unauthorised genetically modified organism is found.

Friends of the Earth has condemned the commissioner's plan.

"If the EU was serious about listening to its citizens, it would not be quietly weakening GMO laws behind closed doors," said Helen Holder, European GM campaigner at the group.

"The EU is falling for the biotech industry’s pro-GM hype. European livestock farmers need real solutions not measures that will simply increase the industry's control and profits."

The EU has approved about 20 GM substances for imports. Brazilian and Argentine sources say the change would be more aimed at cutting costs than ensuring supply.

"There is no crop grown in Brazil that is not allowed in the EU," said one. "We only grow traditional maize. They do not like being reliant on one source. Brazil uses its vast landmass to grow separate GM and non-GM crops. There are separate roads, ports and ships used to avoid contamination."

Argentina grows almost entirely GM soya. Yet the prevalent Round Up Ready variety by the US's Monsanto, is approved in the EU. Brussels is expected to approve Round Up Ready 2, the successor, before Argentina does.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2022 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design