GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2004 articles

Trade rules must change in favour of public health

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 05 May 2004
Created: 05 May 2004
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

"With growing opposition to GMOs and the WTO and a global alliance against the GMO trade dispute (see www.bite-back.org), WTO member states have no choice: better act now to change trade rules in favour of the public health and the environment than wait and be sorry."
---

Trade rules must change in favour of public health
By Alexandra Wandel
Financial Times, May 5 2004
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1083180280556

Sir, You report ("European business groups criticise Lamy", April 28) that the Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederations of Europe (Unice) tried to attack the debate begun by Pascal Lamy, the trade commissioner, about the need to revise world trade rules in order to reflect "collective preferences".

In contrast to Unice, Friends of the Earth believes that such a debate is urgently needed. This is because current world trade rules are out of date and simply do not take account of societal needs or the protection of the environment.

A clear example is the recent complaint by the US administration through the use of World Trade Organisation rules against Europe's precautionary stance against genetically modified organisms. In light of this threat, the European Commission is caving in to WTO and US pressure. The Commission intends to lift the GMO moratorium and national import bans as soon as possible. This will make the Commission very unpopular: 70 per cent of Europeans do not want to eat GMOs.

If Europe is forced to accept GMOs, so will the rest of the world. This has been seen before; in the past the US has used flawed WTO rules against a small number of countries such as Sri Lanka, Bolivia and Croatia in order to prevent them from restricting GM food and farming. A ruling in favour of the biotech industry would result in only a few winners - namely, big biotech corporations - but many losers, including concerned consumers and farmers, as well as losses to wildlife and the environment. In addition, especially after Cancún, the legitimacy of the WTO would be significantly undermined.

With growing opposition to GMOs and the WTO and a global alliance against the GMO trade dispute (see www.bite-back.org), WTO member states have no choice: better act now to change trade rules in favour of the public health and the environment than wait and be sorry.

Alexandra Wandel, Trade Programme Co-ordinator, Friends of the Earth Europe, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design