GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2004 articles

Dairy farms urged to cut out GM feed

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 13 May 2004
Created: 13 May 2004
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

1.Dairy farms urged to cut out GM feed
2.Is this the end of GM wheat?
---

1.Dairy farms urged to cut out GM feed
John Vidal
The Guardian, Thursday May 13, 2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,1215400,00.html

The British dairy industry, which imports hundreds of thousands of tonnes of GM soya and maize for cattle feed every year, could go completely GM-free for less than 1p extra per litre of milk, according to a study by Greenpeace.

Switching to GM-free animal feed would not only be politically and socially popular says the report but would reduce dependency on imports and stimulate better farming. But any extra costs should be borne by the major supermarkets almost all of whose own-brand milk comes from cows fed on GM feed imported from the US and Argentina, it says.

The report, produced with the rural campaign group Farm, urges farmers to give their cows non-GM soya and other imported feed and, in time, to move to growing lupins and other high protein crops for home-grown food.

The idea is endorsed by Michael Eavis, a Somerset dairy farmer and the organiser of the Glastonbury festival. He said: "My cows no longer eat GM feed. It was easy to make the switch because there are non-GM alternatives. And if there was more demand, GM-free feed would become more mainstream."

The report says it would be "inappropriate" for farmers to bear any costs of switching animal feed. "Given their much larger profit margins, the supermarkets ... are clearly best placed to cover the costs," it says.

It also argues that other advantages for the UK dairy industry of switching to non-GM include "less reliance on imported feed ... and, through a less intensive model of farming brought about by home-grown cattle feed, the creation of more rural jobs."

Yesterday the Dairy Industry association said there was no evidence of any GM material in British milk.
---

2.Is this the end of GM wheat?
John Vidal Thursday May 13, 2004 The Guardian (Life section)

Up to a point. Monsanto this week said it was abandoning plans to introduce a GM herbicide-tolerant wheat to the world market following resistance from Canadian and US growers who feared they would lose their massive export markets. But on past performance this may be a tactical withdrawal rather than an admission of defeat.

The company has invested more in researching and developing GM wheat than any other crop. Oil seed rape, maize, cotton and soybeans, its four GM "success stories", were comparatively simple to engineer and market, but the gene-carrying chromosomes of wheat are a collection of complex genomes from three wild grasses. This led to technical problems and long delays to its development and introduction.

Nevertheless, until recently Monsanto thought it had won the race to develop a blockbuster GM wheat that included the herbicide-resistance gene for glyphosate, the active ingredient of its bestselling weedkiller Roundup. Field tests suggested that it increased yields by up to 14%.

The company, which has already dropped efforts to market GM potatoes and vegetables, is not the only group working on GM wheat. However, because Monsanto owns most of the patents relating to herbicide tolerance, other companies wanting to crack the global wheat market must try to develop crops that are resistant to specific diseases.

The Swiss GM company Syngenta has concentrated its research on breeding a wheat that is resistant to fusarium head blight, a fungal disease that costs US farmers roughly $300m a year. It has been working with American universities and field trials are under way in the US, Germany, Spain, Argentina, and Canada.

British GM wheat tests have been largely moved to Germany, but the Institute of Arable Crops Research still has an ongoing programme. China says it has banned the development of GM wheat, but this is hard to verify.,Meanwhile, trials are believed to be taking place in developing countries.

Syngenta says its GM wheat is still years from the market, but following the hostility that Monsanto met from growers, no major company is now likely to try to introduce a GM crop for human consumption on a large scale.

Until European and Japanese consumers and farmers perceive GM wheat to be more beneficial to human health than conventional crops, it is highly unlikely that it will be grown for many years on the great plains and prairies of America and Canada. In one day this week, Monsanto's share price dived 3%, hard-nosed proof that export markets are now just as important as food and environmental safety for biotech companies.

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design