GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2004 articles

Indian Council of Medical Research calls for GM regulation to ensure safety

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 15 August 2004
Created: 15 August 2004
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

In a timely intervention the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) "has suggested stringent norms for ensuring health safety and has proposed vesting of more powers with the health ministry and the agencies operating under it."

A recent report from ICMR noted, "The safety of these components of the genetic construct is not clearly known as they have the potential to induce toxicity, transfer to gut flora or produce unintended effects leading to changes that are relevant from toxicological/nutritional perspective. Specific safety issues associated with GM foods include direct or indirect consequences of new gene product or altered levels of existing gene product due to GM, possibility of gene transfer from ingested GM food and potential adverse effect like allergenicity and toxic effects."
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4177
----

ICMR Proposes Gene Technology Regulator
ASHOK B SHARMA
Financial Express, Monday, August 16, 2004
http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=66046

NEW DELHI, AUG 15: The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has proposed setting up of a National Gene Technology Regulator for ensuring safe applications and use of transgenic technology. It has suggested stringent norms for ensuring health safety and has proposed vesting of more powers with the health ministry and the agencies operating under it.

The suggestions of the ICMR are timely as the Union minister for science and technology, Kapil Sibal recently announced putting in place a single window regulatory body for transgenic crops and products and a national biotechnology policy by January 2005. The minister made this announcement while inaugurating the 'International Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology: Ushering In The Second Green Revolution' on August 10, the three-day global conference was organised jointly by the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), International Service for Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) and the MS Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF).

ICMR's suggestion of a regulatory body is, however, different from that suggested by the MS Swaminathan panel on agriculture biotechnology applications.

The Swaminathan panel recommended setting up of an autonomous National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority comprising of five experts from five different disciplines. It sought to reduce the role of the existing regulator, Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) under the Union environment ministry and vest some more powers with the promoter agency, Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR).

In this context, the ICMR suggested that the proposed National Gene Technology Regulator should have overall mandate of regulating the use of biotechnology products - plants, microbes, animals or drugs. The regulator should protect the health and safety of the people and the environment by identifying and managing risks posed by transgenic technology. "Perhaps this could be achieved by designating one of the ministries for this purpose," the ICMR study said.

Outlining its proposals, the ICMR study entitled ‘Regulatory Regime for Genetically Modified Foods : The Way Ahead’ said that the mechanism of implementation of the environment ministry’s notification needs to be developed with those concerned with food control activities. It suggested that various factors pertaining to food safety should be looked after by the health ministry at stages of application, commercial release, import and post-market surveillance. The study called for for a mechanism to oversee "genetically modified (GM) foods that are imported into the country and GM foods that are marketed in the country after import or even GM foods clandestinely grown without undergoing the proper approval process." It suggested that the Union health ministry with its existing infrastructure is best suited to administer this role.

The ICMR study called for a separate enactment making mandatory for providing information on imported GM foods.

The study said that the health ministry needs to set up a special committee on novel foods as part of the existing central committee for food standards (CCFS) to be chaired by the director-general of ICMR or his nominee. All applications including that for labelling received by the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) of the GEAC should be referred to this proposed special committee on novel foods.

The special committee on novel foods will examine every stage like application for in-house development, environmental release, import, commercial cultivation and trials. Special studies on GM foods should be carried out in laboratories designated by ICMR.

The study said, "In India there is a need to compulsorily label a food if it contains novel DNA/protein or has altered characteristics. However, it need not cover some foods like refined edible oils and the food ingredients added in minor quantities.

The imported food, too, should be subjected to labelling regulations. It should have certificate of origin indicating GMO status and proof of analysis from certified laboratories." The study said that information should be shared with civil societies but they should not be a part of the regulatory process.

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design