GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2004 articles

Lobbyist-regulator tells farmers growing GM food 'safe' (17/8/2004)

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 17 August 2004
Created: 17 August 2004
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

Prof Jennifer Thompson has been telling Australian farmers and others that GM crops are stringently tested for health risks. "These GM crops have been tested rigorously, almost as if they were toxins, and no conventional food has ever been tested like that," Thompson is quoted as saying (item 1).

Yet a study by Professor Ian Pryme and Rolf Lembcke (item 2), published in 2003 in the journal Nutrition and Health, found there were just ten published studies on the health effects of GM food or feed and that the quality of some of these was inadequate. The researchers also noted that several of the independent studies provided evidence of potential harm.

Prof Thompson, on the other hand, says she is so certain that those GM crops that have been approved for commercial release are as safe or are even "far safer" than non-GM food, that she would be willing to put her "head on a block" over the issue.

A leading expert in the field of GM food testing told us, "I don't think that her head on the block would be worth having as there is nothing in it."

What is so shocking about Jennifer Thompson's detachment from scientific reality is that we are not dealing with just some biotech lobbyist. Thompson has been a key figure - probably, the key figure - in shaping South Africa's regulation of GM crops since its first regulatory body SAGENE, which Thompson chaired, was established under South Africa's apartheid regime.

Thompson is still an official advisor on regulatory decisions today. At one and the same time she's a leading figure in a whole series of biotech-industry backed lobby groups, eg AfricaBio, ISAAA, the Council for Biotechnology Information and the African Agricultural Technology Foundation.
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=170

No wonder South Africa has had such a rapid uptake of GM crops when the line between lobbyist and regulator is non-existent.

1.Farmers told growing GM food 'safe'
2.Study shows lack of research into GM health effects
---

1.Farmers told growing GM food 'safe'
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Tuesday, 17 August 2004
http://www.abc.net.au/queensland/news/200408/s1178482.htm

[image caption: Farmers encouraged to plant genetically modified crops. (File photo) ABC TV]

A South African expert on genetically modified (GM) food says Australian farmers should not be afraid of growing the crops.

A professor of microbiology at the University of Cape Town, Jennifer Thompson, has addressed the International Entomology Congress being held in Brisbane.

Ms Thompson says small scale farmers in South Africa are planting GM insect resistant cotton and maize, which she believes could also be grown here.

She says GM crops are stringently tested for health risks.

"These GM crops have been tested rigorously, almost as if they were toxins, and no conventional food has ever been tested like that," she said.

"I would put my head on a block and say that these foods, the ones that have been passed for commercial release, are far safer in many cases than ones that are conventionally bred and might have high levels of pesticides."

Professor Thompson says small farmers in South Africa are planting insect-resistant cotton and maize. She believes many sites in Australia would also be suitable.

"If I was farmers here, I would say absolutely yes," she said. "The results are quite astonishing in many countries and, not only for developing countries but also for first world countries and commercial farmers."
---

2.Study shows lack of research into GM health effects
Medical News Today, 24 Jun 2004
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=9876

A study by scientists in Norway and Denmark shows a serious lack of published research into the health effects of GMOs (genetically modified organisms).

The study by Professor Ian Pryme and Rolf Lembcke was published in the journal Nutrition and Health earlier this year (2003). It says that there have only been ten published studies of the health effects of GM food or feed. The researchers found that the quality of some of these was inadequate.

Over half were undertaken in collaboration with companies (fully or partially), and these found no negative effects on body organs. The other studies were independent and looked more closely at the effects on the gut lining. Several of these found potentially negative changes which have not been explained.

As we know, similar effects on the gut lining were found in the unpublished animal feeding study on the Flavr Savr tomato. Also unpublished is the human feeding trial by Newcastle University which found that transgenes transfer out of GM food into gut bacteria at detectable levels after only one GM meal.

The biotechnology companies often refer to some 100 animal feeding studies as proof of safety. However, these were designed to test the commercial value of the animal feed, not safety. Furthermore, many of these studies were duplicates and not all were published.

To continue reading this study please go to this web page of the Soil Association, UK http://www.soilassociation.org/web/sa/saweb.nsf/0/80256cad0046ee0c80256d66005ae0fe?OpenDocument

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design