GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2004 articles

Oz - Govt stands firm against GM cotton / Revealed: sites of GM canola crops (10/10/2004)

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 10 October 2004
Created: 10 October 2004
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

1.Govt stands firm against GM cotton in Top End
2.Revealed: sites of GM canola crops
------

1.Govt stands firm against GM cotton in Top End
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 7 October 2004
http://abc.net.au/nt/news/200410/s1214969.htm

The Northern Territory Government says growing genetically modified cotton on a commercial level would be damaging to the Territory's reputation.

The Territory Opposition says cotton farming could be considered around the second stage of the Ord River, on the Territory-Western Australian border.

But the Opposition has ruled out growing cotton in areas like the Douglas Daly.

The Minister for Primary Industry Kon Vatskalis says the Government is standing by its decision not to support the introduction of cotton farming anywhere in the Territory.

"If we want to continue to sell food from the Territory to promote the Territory as the origin of good quality food, clean food green food, we have to actually safeguard our other products from the perceptions of public," he said.
------

2.Revealed: sites of GM canola crops
Sunday Mail, 10oct04
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11026756%255E2682,00.html

THE State Government has revealed the locations of two genetically modified canola sites in the South-East.

Agriculture Minister Rory McEwen has disclosed the Global Positioning System (GPS) locations of the sites totalling 18 hectares following pressure from Democrats MLC Ian Gilfillan.

Agricultural research giant Bayer CropScience is paying two farmers at Lucindale and Padthaway to allow the controversial crops to be grown on their properties.

Mr Gilfillan, who obtained the information through a Freedom of Information request, says he intends to reveal the exact addresses to any concerned neighbouring farmers and the public.

"Keeping the locations close to their chest is a dishonest way of dealing with people (the Government) should be taking into their confidence," Mr Gilfillan said yesterday.

He said he was concerned about "contamination" of organic farms several kilometres away, as well as the potential impact of "open air" crops on South Australia's export industry.

"It's too late for farmers who already may have contaminated crops," he said.

The two sites which are larger than most of the earlier trial crops are regarded as the next major step towards the commercialisation of GM canola.

In May, the State Government approved an exemption for Bayer CropScience to plant GM canola at the sites, following about 130 trials throughout the state. The sites, as with the previous trial areas, were approved by the Commonwealth Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.

But Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics chief executive officer Professor Peter Langridge believes the landowners may now need "protection" against anti-GM activists.

Prof Langridge, who said the commercial production of canola in SA was probably "two or three years" away, said the disclosure might lead to vandalism attacks, as has occurred overseas.

"The State Government . . . need to make sure they will provide the proper protection," he said.

BayerScience general manager Susie O'Neill said she hoped anti-GM activists "respect the private property of farmers involved".

She said the company's canola sites were "a lawful business" and the "product is safe".

She said commercialisation of canola "was expected" in SA in the future.

GM canola varieties are touted by supporters as providing larger crop yields and offering herbicide and drought-resistant options for farmers.

Primary Industries and Resources SA strategic policy director Peter Carr said the sites were very closely monitored by PIRSA authorities. "No one can ever say there's no risk for anything but we believe we have adequate separation distances (between GM and organic crops)," he said.

Biological Farmers of Australia, which claims to be the largest certifier of organic farmers, last week wrote to Bayer CropScience, Premier Mike Rann and Victorian Premier Steve Bracks saying GM site disclosure in both states was "critical". "We believe that the opportunity for contamination is highest where pollen is transferred from canola to canola or related species," the letter says.

"Should farms be deemed to be at risk, we are likely to require them to test-product or face the risk of de-certification, market rejection and recall should they be found to sell product that is contaminated."

The group wants to notify organic farmers within a 10km radius of the sites. It says it is also concerned about the potential long-term health impact on humans consuming GM crops.

A spokesman for GM company Monsanto said it had temporarily "suspended any investment" in Australian GM sites because of its frustrations over inconsistent state-by-state laws on GM plantings.

John Tilley, who manages a 4500-acre property next to Lucindale GM crop, said he had no objection to it, largely because it was managed "responsibly".

"They come and see me every year, and I sign a form to say that I don't have a problem; you have to keep an open mind about these things," he said.

Mr Tilley also said monthly checks were carried out by field workers to ensure none of the canola has spread into his property beyond a regulation 300m buffer zone.

"I crop lucerne alongside, so it's not really a problem as far as I'm concerned, as long as they're doing what they say they're doing," he said.

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design