GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Gene Editing
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Search
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • Gene Editing
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

Re: Replacement found for antibiotic resistance genes in GM crops

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 22 August 2005
Twitter

Interesting response from Clare Oxborrow of Friends of the Earth. The Emily referred to is Emily Diamond, a researcher with FoE.
------

Hello

We were asked for a comment on this research - which Emily has had a look at. Some points on it are:

Whilst it is an interesting lab experiment, it is far too early to tell whether it will have any benefit in the real world. One of the major issues is that many GM products, either already on the market or in the pipeline, currently use bacterial antibiotic resistant marker genes, so the research is too late for these products and their potential impacts.

Another major issue is that it is not clear what the actual function of those genes is and what impact inserting them could have on the plant.

The researchers admit that "their functions remain largely unknown".

This raises a number of questions; what are the consequences for food safety? Will there be any adverse effects during cultivation? It doesn't look like there were any attempts to address these issues, for example, only things like plant height and number of leaves were assessed when comparing the GM to the non-GM plant.

The research was carried out on tobacco, not food plants. In tobacco, only the leaf is used whereas in food crops other parts of the plant are used, such as storage organs. It is not clear whether this technique would even work in food plants and if it did, again, what the impact would be.

Whilst this may solve one problem associated with genetic modification, it could well create new ones.

It's also been covered on bbc online by Richard Black...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4167040.stm)

Clare
--

GM Campaigner
Friends of the Earth (England, Wales and Northern Ireland)
26-28 Underwood Street, London, N1 7JQ, United Kingdom
Direct line: +44 (0)20 7566 1716
Switchboard: +44 (0)20 7490 1555
Fax: +44 (0)20 7490 0881
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design