GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM industry has tied the hands of governments and regulators

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 10 November 2012
Twitter

Is anyone in the regulatory authorities worried about Seralini's data?
Claire Robinson
Co-author of new study showing the regulatory failure that led to approval of glyphosate
 http://www.omicsonline.org/2161-0525/2161-0525-S4-006.php?aid=7453

Since Seralini's data on the toxic effects of GM maize and Roundup were published in September, one government agency after another has come out with a statement with a message equivalent to "Nothing to see here, move along please," while chucking Seralini's study into the waste bin.

But this isn't the message I'm getting from independent scientists and experts. Everyone, including those who point out that Seralini's study, like all studies, has flaws and limitations, has said that his data must be taken seriously and that there is plenty of cause for concern about these products.

I couldn't help but wonder: is there anyone in any regulatory authority who is the least bit worried by Seralini's data? Not to mention all the other studies by independent scientists showing a link between Roundup and birth defects, some types of cancer, reproductive problems, neurological disease, and a host of other ills?
 http://gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14418

An inside source tells me that there are now people in EU and member state regulatory authorities who are "very concerned" about the safety of glyphosate and GM Roundup Ready crops. But accepting that there is a risk is now a major political problem for governments and their agencies.

If the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and national regulatory bodies were to accept even that there is a need to do further tests, they would be under pressure to ban the import of GM crops immediately.

This would mean, in their view, that
(a) we would not have enough livestock feed in Europe (our pig and chicken production in particular would have major commercial problems) and
(b) Europe would face a trade war with the USA.

This fits with what Maria Rodale, CEO of the health and organic products company Rodale Inc in the US said about President Obama's less than decisive action on GMO labelling:

"Yes, he's got a chef in the kitchen who primarily uses organic foods. But he's also got the iron fist of the massive, mean, and all-pervasive Monsanto lobby he has to deal with. Trust me, what I've heard from insiders is that it's even worse than you imagine. People in Washington are scared of them."
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maria-rodale/what-is-proposition-37-th_b_2038449.html

Since the GM industry has effectively tied the hands of our governments and regulators, it's down to us, as consumers, to take action. How? We can stop listening to regulatory "assurances" about the safety of substances and make our own minds up. We can eat organic, as organic production bans the use of GM seeds. And we can minimise our intake of the major GM crops - corn, soy, and canola. Spread the word.

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design