GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

CRISPR/Cas in animals: Unintended changes and unexpected patterns of inheritance

Details
Published: 16 February 2022
Twitter

Findings are relevant for planned marketing of GM laying hens

In experiments with zebrafish, researchers have for the first time shown that unintended effects of CRISPR/Cas applications are inherited in subsequent generations, as Testbiotech reports. The researchers also found unusual patterns of inheritance. According to the scientists, the findings show that the effects of CRISPR/Cas applications on subsequent generations need to be examined in much greater detail.

Previous experiments with CRISPR/Cas in zebrafish have found large structural changes at off-target sites. This means that the gene scissors can cut genomic regions outside of the target site, and thus cause specific unintended mutations. The experiments are part of basic research. In this context, zebrafish are seen as important model organisms. The researchers assume that unintended genetic changes at off-target sites can be more concerning compared to those at on-target regions, as the effects may go unnoticed.

Many of the unintended genetic alterations have now been observed in the subsequent generation. Surprisingly, in some cases, not all the bodily cells of the fish were affected. In addition, again in some cases, the researchers found non-Mendelian patterns of inheritance, with some alterations being homozygous while others were heterozygous. The findings show that unintended effects caused by the gene scissors can lead to specific effects and new risks.

Consequently, the offspring of animals manipulated with CRISPR/Cas for use in agriculture need to be examined in greater detail to detect unintended genetic alterations. The first of these animals might be genetically engineered laying hens: Researchers in Israel have used CRISPR/Cas to alter hens so that they do not produce male offspring. A deadly gene is passed on to any male offspring, which should cause these chicks to die in the egg before they hatch. A patent for the process and the resulting animals has already been filed. The chicken could in due course be marketed in cooperation with a US company.

According to some media reports, there are also plans to market the hens and their eggs in the EU. Regulation in the EU requires mandatory risk assessment and labelling of offspring from genetically engineered organisms. The recent research on zebrafish shows just how important these legal requirements are. It provides evidence that if animals are engineered with new genetic engineering techniques, their offspring also may suffer from unintended genetic changes that are associated with specific risks.

Source of commentary: Testbiotech
https://www.testbiotech.org/en/news/crisprcas-animals-unintended-changes-and-unexpected-patterns-inheritance

Further information

Recent publication on CRISPR/Cas-zebrafish
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28244-5

Previous news on research with CRISPR/Cas zebrafish
https://www.testbiotech.org/aktuelles/unbeabsichtigte-veraenderungen-durch-crisprcas-zeigen-neuartige-risiken

Patent application on genetically engineered chickens
https://patentscope2.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020178822

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design