Regulators say GM salmon can’t be sold until the FDA publishes final labelling guidelines, and the agency hasn’t
EXCERPT: Murkowski’s rider … said the acceptable market name for the AquaBounty fish has to include the terms “genetically engineered” or “GE”.
Bill rider holds GE salmon at bay
By Liz Ruskin
Alaska Public Media, July 21, 2017
Federal regulators have already approved a genetically engineered salmon for human consumption. One reason it’s not for sale in the U.S.: A few short paragraphs that have hitched a ride on a congressional spending bill.
Regulators say GE salmon can’t be sold until the FDA publishes final labeling guidelines, and the agency hasn’t.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski has again inserted that rider in the agriculture spending bill, which would continue the restriction for another year. The bill cleared the Appropriations Committee this week. Murkowski told the committee the labeling has to be mandatory.
“Instead, right now, labeling is voluntary, and if you think any manufacturer of ‘frankenfish’ is going to voluntarily put that on the label of that fish, you’re not thinking straight,” Murkowski said.
In Panama, a company called AquaBounty is growing engineered salmon from eggs that are fertilized with genetically altered milt in Canada. The product is designed as a fast-grower for fish-farming.
In 2015, the FDA ruled the fish is safe for human consumption.
Murkowski’s rider also said the acceptable market name for the AquaBounty fish has to include the terms “genetically engineered” or “GE.”
Murkowski has filed a separate GE salmon labeling bill.
“If families are going to serve this, then I think they deserve to know that what you’re eating is not the wild-caught salmon,” Murkowski said.
Mandatory labeling for genetically modified organisms is controversial in Congress. Many farm-state lawmakers say there’s no scientific basis to label GMO foods differently, and they maintain it will erode public confidence in GMO crops.
Murkowski said a genetically engineered fish is different.