GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Latest News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • Archive
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
    • Daily Digest
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Links
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2001 articles

Prove you're GM-free, farmers told by Unilever

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 07 December 2001
Created: 07 December 2001
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

1. Prove you're GM-free, Australian farmers told
2. FAO urges poor nations to boost organic food sales

***

1. Prove you're GM-free, Australian farmers told
By Boyd Champness
Australian agricultural news from FWi, Monday, 3 December, 2001.
Farmers' Weekly interactive: FWi at http://www.fwi.co.uk
http://www.connectotel.com/gmfood/fw031201.txt

GLOBAL food-processing giant Unilever has told Australian farmers they must provide proof that their crops are free of genetic modification if they want to continue supplying to the company.

Unilever heads a number of major food processors who are insisting that farmers, trucking firms and even seed suppliers establish vast paper trials to identify and prove ingredients derived from oilseeds, pulses and, in the near future, even potatoes are not genetically modified.

Farmers who want to supply foods free of genetic modification will have to create a special system to document and prove their crops are not tainted with manipulated genes.

The Weekly Times newspaper reported last week that the Australian arm of Unilever has already demanded that its suppliers prove and track grains and other produce from the seed source to silo, mill or crusher, in a bid to maintain consumer confidence that its products are not made from GM crops.

The newspaper reported that Unilever, Goodman Fielder and other processors have spent months screening ingredients to ensure they are GM-free, in preparation for the introduction  of new national labelling regulations that come into force on Friday (7 December).

The new regulations require all foods containing more than 1% of genetically modified material to be labelled accordingly.

The local grains industry is rushing to develop identity preservation (IP) systems to segregate conventional crops from GM varieties to ensure they meet processors' demands.

Unilever has made it clear that farmers wanting to supply to the company will need to embrace IP systems.

"If we can't get IP, then we replace the product with a flavor or something else," a Unilever spokeswoman told The Weekly Times.

Many farmers argue that the move is premature considering that an insect-resistant cottonseed is the only GM crop approved for commercial operation in Australia to date.

But processors argue that other GM crops will be released commercially in Australia within the next two seasons and want the systems in place now.

The other major concern for farmers is who will pick up the bill for identity preservation.

The Weekly Times reported that the Australian Gene Technology Grains Working Group is trying to determine how much effort should be put into developing IP systems, given the lack of premium in the market for non-GM products.

Working group consultant Peter Flottman told the newspaper there was a genuine concern that the lack of any premium for non-GM products in export markets meant there was little  incentive for growers to take on on-farm identity preservation, especially if GM crops proved to be significantly more productive [that will be the day!!!] than conventional cultivars, as they have been in North America. [amazing how the biotech industry hype triumphs over reality: see
http://members.tripod.com/~ngin/
for the reality of reduced yields, corporate control and market exclusion]

***

2. FAO urges poor nations to boost organic food sales [means keep land and crops GM free]
(Reuters) ITALY: December 4, 2001
http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=13562&newsdate=04-Dec-2001

ROME - The United Nations food body urged poor nations yesterday to boost exports of organic produce to take advantage of booming markets in developed countries.

"Domestic production of organic products in developed countries is expected to rise within the next few years, but it is unlikely to meet demand for most products," the Rome-based U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) said in a report.

"As demand for organic fresh produce is expected to continue to exceed production in developed countries, imports will be needed to meet consumers' demand," said the study, entitled "World markets for organic fruit and vegetables."

Organic agriculture restricts the use of synthetic fertilisers and pesticides.

The market surveys carried out for the study indicated fast growth in sales of organic fruit and vegetables in most developed nations.

"Sales values were found to increase in most markets at annual rates generally ranging between 20 and 30 percent during the last years of the 1990s," the report said.

"Particularly high growth rates have recently been observed in the United Kingdom and in Italy," it added.

"In Italy, organic fruit and vegetable retail sales have grown at an annual rate of about 85 percent during 1998-2000, while in the early months of 2001, after the detection of the first case of 'mad cow disease' in Italy, growth rates moved even higher."

PROXIMITY HELPS

Developing nations located nearest to northern developed markets had the best chance of success in boosting their fresh organic food exports, according to the report.

"For products that cannot be produced in the colder climates in northern developed countries (e.g. oranges, kiwi etc) most organic supply comes from producing countries close to these markets, such as nations in the Mediterranean area for the EU," it said.

FAO said success in exporting to developed country markets depended on offering a more competitive producer and FOB price while meeting at least the organic and phytosanitary standards and providing the same quality as conventional products.

The report outlined the following recommendations to developing nations to boost exports to developed markets:

* Establish national or regional organic standards and regulations and a reliable independent accreditation and control system.

* Increase know-how on organic farming and organic inputs.

* Ensure good post-harvest handling (e.g. cold storage), good infrastructure and logistics (including harbour and airports).

* Maintain reliable relations with an importer, trader or wholesaler in the target market.

According to the study, the highest values of total organic food sales in 2000 were found in the United States ($8 billion), followed by Germany ($2.1 billion), Britain ($986 million) and Italy ($978 million).

Story by David Brough
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2019 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design