"THE HOPE OF THE INDUSTRY IS THAT OVER TIME THE MARKET IS SO FLOODED [WITH GM] THAT THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT, YOU JUST SORT OF SURRENDER." - Don Westfall, vice-president, Promar International
---
1. alert re: Codex and labeling
2. comment from Robert Vint of GFA
---
1. alert re: Codex and labeling
We are not acting enough at the Codex Alimentarius sector. Read the proposal. Below.
Luiz Eduardo Carvalho
Fed Univ of Rio de Janeiro
www.ufrj.br/consumo
Agenda Item 11 CRD.1
JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD LABELLING
Twenty-ninth Session
Ottawa, Canada, 1 - 4 May 2001
OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WORK
PROPOSAL FOR NEW WORK:
CLAIMS ON THE ABSENCE OF FOOD PRODUCED USING GENE TECHNOLOGY (NEGATIVE CLAIMS)
(proposal by Australia and South Africa)
Background
1. Labelling claims made regarding the absence of food or food ingredients produced using certain techniques of genetic modification/genetic engineering, so called ënegative claimsÃ, are increasingly being applied on a voluntary basis by food businesses in many countries to address a perceived consumer demand or market niche for such foods. The number of food products carrying such negative labelling claims often far exceeds the occurrence of positive labels even in countries where positive labelling is mandatory.
2. Such negative labelling claims may be regulated under general provisions within food law regarding false or misleading conduct, and/or through general provisions within consumer protection or fair trading/trade practices legislation that regulate false, misleading or deceptive conduct.
3. Negative labelling claims on food produced using gene technology however bring with them issues not specifically recognised in such legislation. For example;
§ negative claims made regarding the absence of novel GM components (recombinant DNA or novel protein) within a food may lead consumers to conclude gene technology was not used at any step of production,
§ negative claims made on food or ingredients that do not have a genetically modified/engineered counterpart while truthful may be deceptive, and
§ negative claims may erroneously be applied to foods or ingredients which contain GM components but fall below a permitted ingredient threshold for positive labelling.
Regulation and Guidance on Negative Claims
4. Some countries (e.g. Netherlands, Austria and Germany) have recognised these anomalies difficulties by developing regulations specific to negative claims for foods produced using gene technology.
5. Australia provides specific advice on the use and limitation of negative claims in the Compliance Guide for Labelling of Food Produced using Gene Technology developed to support positive labelling requirements coming into effect in December 2001.
6. The scope and general principles of the Codex General Guidelines on Claims (clause 1.2) emphasises the importance of regulations on the representation of food in stating: ìno food should be described or presented in a manner that is false, misleading or deceptive or is likely to create an erroneous impression regarding its character in any respectî. The Guideline also emphasises (clause 3.5) that: ìclaims that could give rise to doubt about the safety of similar food or which could arouse or exploit fear in the consumerî should be prohibited.
7. While these general Codex provisions recognise the importance of setting wide-ranging regulations to prohibit misleading claims, they do not adequately address issues specific to negative claims for food produced using gene technology.
8. The Codex Guideline for the Labelling of Food and Food Ingredients Obtained Through Certain Techniques of Genetic Modification/Genetic Engineering (CX/FL 01/7; at Step 3 of the Codex Procedure) incorporates no guidance with respect to negative claims.
9. Lack of international harmonisation on the application and use of negative labelling claims for food produced using gene technology has potentially serious implications in the trade of such foods. There is thus an imperative to establish common approaches to regulating such claims.
Proposal for New Work
10. Clear and specific guidance must provided by Codex on the use and applicability of negative labelling claims for food produced using gene technology. Developing guidance on this issue may be approached by either:
§ reviewing the Codex General Guideline on Claims to elaborate the applicability and use of negative claims for food produced using gene technology, or
§ incorporating guidance on the issue in the proposed Codex Guideline for the Labelling of Food and Food Ingredients Obtained Through Certain Techniques of Genetic Modification/Genetic Engineering.
11. Specific issues on which guidance should be provided include:
§ The availability and accreditation of evidence to substantiate statement or claims regarding the absence of food produced using gene technology;
§ Whether the statement or claim is likely to mislead consumers regarding the food or ingredients safety, nutritional value or composition as compared to food or ingredients produced using biotechnology
§ That where an absolute statement or claim is made, such as ‘GM free’ the claim applies to the production of all components within the food or ingredient (such absolute claims should not allow for accidental presence of a genetically modified component of presence of biotech components as minor or trace ingredients and would be technically difficult to enforce);
§ Where the statement or claim cannot be guaranteed, as is likely for food or ingredients marketed or processed using identity preservation systems, the statement should be qualified to accurately reflect the efforts of the manufacturer including systems of accreditation used;
§ Where a food or ingredients produced using gene technology is specifically exempt from positive labelling, the application of a negative claim is potentially deceptive and could mislead consumers; and
§ Negative labelling statements or claims should be limited to those foods or ingredients for which biotech counterparts exist in the market.
---
2. COMMENT OF ROBERT VINT OF GFA ALERT
SOUTH AFRICA and AUSTRALIA, two of the most pro-GM nations, are to call for severe curbs on GM-Free and non-GM labels at the forthcoming meeting of the WTO's CODEX Committee on 1st-4th May. Below is the full text of their proposal.
Genetic Food Alert UK believe that a threefold strategy is being used by the biotech industry and its allies to break the global consumer boycott of GM foods by abolishing food labeling. This strategy involves: 1. Maximising the global spread of GM pollution through the deliberate contamination of seed supplies, the non-segregation of raw materials for the food industry and the imposition of uncontained 'field trials' of GM crops on regions wishing to be GM-Free. Whilst the GM contamination of food is still principally a US problem, the contamination of seeds from the US and Canada, together with the 'trialling' of GM crops in hundreds of locations in many countries threatens to globalise the problem.
2. Undermining public support for negative GM labeling by finding and giving high-level publicity to any food products labeled as 'non-GM' or 'GM-Free' that they have succeeded in contaminating - and then calling for national and international bans on such labels. Major ingredient suppliers linked to the biotech industry currently tell manufacturers that such claims are 'impossible' to justify, whilst independent producers that have exercised due diligence in avoiding contamination are happy to make such claims.
3. Opposing statutory GM labeling by ensuring that there is so much contamination that everything has to be labeled as GM, by demanding that contamination thresholds are increased every time the background contamination level increases, or by outlawing statutory GM labeling globally (via the WTO) as an 'obstacle to free trade'.
Genetic Food Alert believes that, even in the face of widespread GM contamination, consumers have the right to know through appropriate labeling which producers have taken rigorous steps to avoid the use of GM ingredients or their accidental presence in food items. GFA calls upon consumers organisations worldwide to urgently oppose national and international legal changes designed to remove this right and to alert the public to any such developments in their nation.