Iowa joins Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Kansas in reporting crop damage from drift of dicamba herbicide sprayed on GM dicamba-tolerant crops
EXCERPT: To summarize, off-target movement and injury to soybean has been common from fields treated with the new dicamba products. While "growing pains" are often experienced when new products are introduced, the frequency and size of area affected by off-target dicamba movement is much greater than with other new products.
Dicamba drift injury: Iowa farmers join the club
By Bob Hartzler, Iowa State University Agronomist
AgFax, July 12, 2017
The problems experienced with off-target movement and injury in states south of Iowa, particularly Missouri, Arkansas, and Tennessee have been well covered in the press, but there has been little discussion of problems in Iowa.
Unfortunately, the lack of press does not mean everything has gone smoothly in the state. While I don’t know the percentage of Xtend soybean fields experiencing problems with off-target movement, in my mind the number is too high.
The majority of off-target injury has been to soybean in the vicinity of Xtend soybean fields. This is due to soybean responding to much lower concentrations of dicamba than most other plants. I recently visited a site where soybean in at least three fields, managed by two different farmers, showed dicamba symptoms.
The only dicamba used in the area was applied to an Xtend field upwind of the injured fields. I am not aware of any fields where the damage would be described as severe; however, in most fields I don’t think it is possible to know whether the injury will limit yields. In many cases the entire field shows damage, making it difficult to document yield effects.
As of July 7, the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS) reported they had received eight drift/off-target herbicide complaints attributed to dicamba. The relatively low number of ‘official’ complaints could be taken as a good sign, but most farmers/applicators try to solve the problem without involving the state.
The EPA requires companies with dicamba formulations registered for use on Xtend soybean (BASF, DuPont and Monsanto) to report all cases of non-performance and off-target injury. When these data are available, they will provide a better estimate of the frequency of problems than the IDALS numbers. However, I do not know how frequently the company is notified in these situations, especially when the injury level is low.
To summarize, off-target movement and injury to soybean has been common from fields treated with the new dicamba products. While ‘growing pains’ are often experienced when new products are introduced, the frequency and size of area affected by off-target dicamba movement is much greater than with other new products.
Many other plants on the landscape are sensitive to dicamba, including fruits, vegetables, trees and other ornamentals. My concern is that as the acres of Xtend soybean treated with dicamba increases, the injury will become more widespread and not be limited to soybean.